On August 2025, 0xf340 was exploited in a access control, resulting in approximately $4K in losses. That makes the 0xf340 exploit the 416th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the 0xf340 Access Control Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to 0xf340
The 0xf340 incident on August 27, 2025 is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it. In the full archive, 0xf340 is 1 of 77 documented access control incidents.
0xf340 in Context
At $4K, the 0xf340 exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M.
Prior Access Control Before 0xf340
The nearest access control incident before 0xf340 was ABCCApp, 4 days earlier on August 23, 2025 ($10.1K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the access control attack surface.
Impact & Recovery for 0xf340
0xf340 Loss Figure
The 0xf340 exploit caused $4,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 78th largest of 96 documented in 2025.
Where 0xf340 Sits Among Access Control Attacks
Ranked by loss size, 0xf340 is the 53rd largest of 77 access control incidents documented. That puts the 0xf340 loss below the class average of $636K.
Timeline Since the 0xf340 Incident
The 0xf340 exploit occurred 8 months ago (230 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for 0xf340
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the 0xf340 incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did 0xf340 lose?
The 0xf340 exploit in August 2025 resulted in $4,000 in losses — the 78th largest of 96 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the 0xf340 hack happen?
The 0xf340 exploit was recorded on August 27, 2025 — 230 days ago.
What type of exploit hit 0xf340?
The 0xf340 incident is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it.
How common is the Access Control pattern seen at 0xf340?
Our archive contains 77 documented access control incidents. The 0xf340 incident is one of them.
How does 0xf340 compare to the largest Access Control attack?
The largest access control incident in our archive is Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M. The 0xf340 loss is $4K.
What mechanism does the BBDSPP scheme employ for privacy protection?
It uses non-interactive zero-knowledge proof technology for lightweight identity verification, preventing unauthorized access.
What is a significant challenge for the empirical analysis of market feedback effects?
Identifying the causal effect of market prices on corporate decisions.