On September 2024, INUMI_db27 was exploited in a access control, resulting in approximately $4.7K in losses. That makes the INUMI_db27 exploit the 414th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the INUMI_db27 Access Control Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to INUMI_db27
The INUMI_db27 incident on September 11, 2024 is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it. In the full archive, INUMI_db27 is 1 of 77 documented access control incidents.
INUMI_db27 in Context
At $4.7K, the INUMI_db27 exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M.
Prior Access Control Before INUMI_db27
The nearest access control incident before INUMI_db27 was PLN, 6 days earlier on September 5, 2024 ($400K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the access control attack surface.
Impact & Recovery for INUMI_db27
INUMI_db27 Loss Figure
The INUMI_db27 exploit caused $4,700 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 126th largest of 188 documented in 2024.
Where INUMI_db27 Sits Among Access Control Attacks
Ranked by loss size, INUMI_db27 is the 52nd largest of 77 access control incidents documented. That puts the INUMI_db27 loss below the class average of $636K.
Timeline Since the INUMI_db27 Incident
The INUMI_db27 exploit occurred 1.6 years ago (580 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for INUMI_db27
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the INUMI_db27 incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did INUMI_db27 lose?
The INUMI_db27 exploit in September 2024 resulted in $4,700 in losses — the 126th largest of 188 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the INUMI_db27 hack happen?
The INUMI_db27 exploit was recorded on September 11, 2024 — 580 days ago.
What type of exploit hit INUMI_db27?
The INUMI_db27 incident is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it.
How common is the Access Control pattern seen at INUMI_db27?
Our archive contains 77 documented access control incidents. The INUMI_db27 incident is one of them.
How does INUMI_db27 compare to the largest Access Control attack?
The largest access control incident in our archive is Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M. The INUMI_db27 loss is $4.7K.
During which months was the questionnaire for the study distributed?
August to December 2022.
What challenges does the proposed system aim to address within remote healthcare monitoring?
It aims to solve issues related to data privacy, security, and the integrity of health data transmitted across networks.