On July 2025, SuperRare was exploited in a access control, resulting in approximately $730K in losses. That makes the SuperRare exploit the 103rd largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the SuperRare Access Control Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to SuperRare
The SuperRare incident on July 28, 2025 is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it. In the full archive, SuperRare is 1 of 77 documented access control incidents.
SuperRare in Context
At $730K, the SuperRare exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M.
Prior Access Control Before SuperRare
The nearest access control incident before SuperRare was Unverified, 23 days earlier on July 5, 2025 ($285.7K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the access control attack surface.
Impact & Recovery for SuperRare
SuperRare Loss Figure
The SuperRare exploit caused $730,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 18th largest of 96 documented in 2025.
Where SuperRare Sits Among Access Control Attacks
Ranked by loss size, SuperRare is the 8th largest of 77 access control incidents documented. That puts the SuperRare loss above the class average of $636K.
Timeline Since the SuperRare Incident
The SuperRare exploit occurred 9 months ago (260 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for SuperRare
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the SuperRare incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did SuperRare lose?
The SuperRare exploit in July 2025 resulted in $730,000 in losses — the 18th largest of 96 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the SuperRare hack happen?
The SuperRare exploit was recorded on July 28, 2025 — 260 days ago.
What type of exploit hit SuperRare?
The SuperRare incident is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it.
How common is the Access Control pattern seen at SuperRare?
Our archive contains 77 documented access control incidents. The SuperRare incident is one of them.
How does SuperRare compare to the largest Access Control attack?
The largest access control incident in our archive is Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M. The SuperRare loss is $730K.
How does the Dual-Head Attention Network module function in the context of financial anti-fraud?
It combines Node Attention Networks and Semantic Attention Networks for detailed transaction analysis.
What role does smart contract technology play in blockchain for e-commerce?
Smart contracts automate and secure transactions by executing terms of agreements based on predefined conditions.