On July 2023, USDTStakingContract28 was exploited in a access control, resulting in approximately $21K in losses. That makes the USDTStakingContract28 exploit the 330th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the USDTStakingContract28 Access Control Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to USDTStakingContract28
The USDTStakingContract28 incident on July 15, 2023 is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it. In the full archive, USDTStakingContract28 is 1 of 77 documented access control incidents.
USDTStakingContract28 in Context
At $21K, the USDTStakingContract28 exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M.
Prior Access Control Before USDTStakingContract28
The nearest access control incident before USDTStakingContract28 was Civfund, 7 days earlier on July 8, 2023 ($165K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the access control attack surface.
USDTStakingContract28 Vulnerability Signature
The primary source categorises the USDTStakingContract28 exploit specifically as “Lack of access control”. This narrower label is entity-specific: it reflects how the USDTStakingContract28 contract failed, rather than the broad access control pattern alone.
Impact & Recovery for USDTStakingContract28
USDTStakingContract28 Loss Figure
The USDTStakingContract28 exploit caused $20,999 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 125th largest of 214 documented in 2023.
Where USDTStakingContract28 Sits Among Access Control Attacks
Ranked by loss size, USDTStakingContract28 is the 39th largest of 77 access control incidents documented. That puts the USDTStakingContract28 loss below the class average of $636K.
Timeline Since the USDTStakingContract28 Incident
The USDTStakingContract28 exploit occurred 2.8 years ago (1,004 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for USDTStakingContract28
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the USDTStakingContract28 incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did USDTStakingContract28 lose?
The USDTStakingContract28 exploit in July 2023 resulted in $20,999 in losses — the 125th largest of 214 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the USDTStakingContract28 hack happen?
The USDTStakingContract28 exploit was recorded on July 15, 2023 — 1,004 days ago.
What type of exploit hit USDTStakingContract28?
The USDTStakingContract28 incident is classified as a Access Control. A privileged function lacks a proper authorisation check, letting an unauthorised caller execute it.
How common is the Access Control pattern seen at USDTStakingContract28?
Our archive contains 77 documented access control incidents. The USDTStakingContract28 incident is one of them.
How does USDTStakingContract28 compare to the largest Access Control attack?
The largest access control incident in our archive is Corkprotocol (2025) at $12M. The USDTStakingContract28 loss is $21K.
Why was Litecoin chosen for the study?
Due to its ability to validate more transactions per unit time and its lower unit price.
What potential does blockchain technology offer beyond cryptocurrencies?
It offers prospects to improve financial transactions, increase transparency, and broaden investment market participation.