On July 2023, APEDAO was exploited in a business logic flaw, resulting in approximately $7K in losses. That makes the APEDAO exploit the 398th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the APEDAO Business Logic Flaw Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to APEDAO
The APEDAO incident on July 18, 2023 is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share. In the full archive, APEDAO is 1 of 144 documented business logic flaw incidents.
APEDAO in Context
At $7K, the APEDAO exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M.
Prior Business Logic Flaw Before APEDAO
The nearest business logic flaw incident before APEDAO was Platypus, 6 days earlier on July 12, 2023 ($51K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the business logic flaw attack surface.
Impact & Recovery for APEDAO
APEDAO Loss Figure
The APEDAO exploit caused $7,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 144th largest of 214 documented in 2023.
Where APEDAO Sits Among Business Logic Flaw Attacks
Ranked by loss size, APEDAO is the 90th largest of 144 business logic flaw incidents documented. That puts the APEDAO loss below the class average of $6.08M.
Timeline Since the APEDAO Incident
The APEDAO exploit occurred 2.7 years ago (1,001 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for APEDAO
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the APEDAO incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did APEDAO lose?
The APEDAO exploit in July 2023 resulted in $7,000 in losses — the 144th largest of 214 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the APEDAO hack happen?
The APEDAO exploit was recorded on July 18, 2023 — 1,001 days ago.
What type of exploit hit APEDAO?
The APEDAO incident is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share.
How common is the Business Logic Flaw pattern seen at APEDAO?
Our archive contains 144 documented business logic flaw incidents. The APEDAO incident is one of them.
How does APEDAO compare to the largest Business Logic Flaw attack?
The largest business logic flaw incident in our archive is – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M. The APEDAO loss is $7K.
What is the primary objective of utilizing AutoML tools in time series forecasting?
To automate the process of building and optimizing ML models, making ML more accessible for users without extensive technical knowledge.
What method is used to assess the impact of COVID-19 on stock markets?
The event study method is used.