On June 2023, Contract_0x7657 was exploited in a business logic flaw, resulting in approximately $20K in losses. That makes the Contract_0x7657 exploit the 331st largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the Contract_0x7657 Business Logic Flaw Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to Contract_0x7657
The Contract_0x7657 incident on June 19, 2023 is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share. In the full archive, Contract_0x7657 is 1 of 144 documented business logic flaw incidents.
Contract_0x7657 in Context
At $20K, the Contract_0x7657 exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M.
Prior Business Logic Flaw Before Contract_0x7657
The nearest business logic flaw incident before Contract_0x7657 was Pawnfi, 2 days earlier on June 17, 2023 ($820K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the business logic flaw attack surface.
Contract_0x7657 Vulnerability Signature
The primary source categorises the Contract_0x7657 exploit specifically as “Business Logic”. This narrower label is entity-specific: it reflects how the Contract_0x7657 contract failed, rather than the broad business logic flaw pattern alone.
Impact & Recovery for Contract_0x7657
Contract_0x7657 Loss Figure
The Contract_0x7657 exploit caused $20,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 126th largest of 214 documented in 2023.
Where Contract_0x7657 Sits Among Business Logic Flaw Attacks
Ranked by loss size, Contract_0x7657 is the 68th largest of 144 business logic flaw incidents documented. That puts the Contract_0x7657 loss below the class average of $6.08M.
Timeline Since the Contract_0x7657 Incident
The Contract_0x7657 exploit occurred 2.8 years ago (1,030 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for Contract_0x7657
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the Contract_0x7657 incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did Contract_0x7657 lose?
The Contract_0x7657 exploit in June 2023 resulted in $20,000 in losses — the 126th largest of 214 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the Contract_0x7657 hack happen?
The Contract_0x7657 exploit was recorded on June 19, 2023 — 1,030 days ago.
What type of exploit hit Contract_0x7657?
The Contract_0x7657 incident is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share.
How common is the Business Logic Flaw pattern seen at Contract_0x7657?
Our archive contains 144 documented business logic flaw incidents. The Contract_0x7657 incident is one of them.
How does Contract_0x7657 compare to the largest Business Logic Flaw attack?
The largest business logic flaw incident in our archive is – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M. The Contract_0x7657 loss is $20K.
How does the payment channel update phase function?
It allows the redistribution of locked funds based on off-chain transactions between parties.
What does the study reveal about the diversification within the cryptocurrency space?
It highlights the diversification shaped by technological characteristics, temporal considerations, and the influence of monetary policy.