On February 2023, – DYNA was exploited in a business logic flaw, resulting in approximately $21K in losses. That makes the – DYNA exploit the 327th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the – DYNA Business Logic Flaw Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to – DYNA
The – DYNA incident on February 22, 2023 is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share. In the full archive, – DYNA is 1 of 144 documented business logic flaw incidents.
– DYNA in Context
At $21K, the – DYNA exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M.
Prior Business Logic Flaw Before – DYNA
The nearest business logic flaw incident before – DYNA was – Platypusdefi, 5 days earlier on February 17, 2023 ($8.5M lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the business logic flaw attack surface.
Impact & Recovery for – DYNA
– DYNA Loss Figure
The – DYNA exploit caused $21,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 124th largest of 214 documented in 2023.
Where – DYNA Sits Among Business Logic Flaw Attacks
Ranked by loss size, – DYNA is the 67th largest of 144 business logic flaw incidents documented. That puts the – DYNA loss below the class average of $6.08M.
Timeline Since the – DYNA Incident
The – DYNA exploit occurred 3.1 years ago (1,147 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for – DYNA
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the – DYNA incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did – DYNA lose?
The – DYNA exploit in February 2023 resulted in $21,000 in losses — the 124th largest of 214 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the – DYNA hack happen?
The – DYNA exploit was recorded on February 22, 2023 — 1,147 days ago.
What type of exploit hit – DYNA?
The – DYNA incident is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share.
How common is the Business Logic Flaw pattern seen at – DYNA?
Our archive contains 144 documented business logic flaw incidents. The – DYNA incident is one of them.
How does – DYNA compare to the largest Business Logic Flaw attack?
The largest business logic flaw incident in our archive is – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M. The – DYNA loss is $21K.
What is the significance of threshold adaptor signatures in the context of blockchain security?
Threshold adaptor signatures enhance security by requiring a subset of key holders to participate, mitigating the risk of a single point of failure.
How is interoperability achieved in the proposed healthcare monitoring system?
By standardizing data formats and protocols, and using blockchain as a universal ledger accessible by authorized entities.