On August 2023, EHIVE was exploited in a business logic flaw, resulting in approximately $15K in losses. That makes the EHIVE exploit the 356th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the EHIVE Business Logic Flaw Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to EHIVE
The EHIVE incident on August 21, 2023 is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share. In the full archive, EHIVE is 1 of 144 documented business logic flaw incidents.
EHIVE in Context
At $15K, the EHIVE exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M.
Prior Business Logic Flaw Before EHIVE
The nearest business logic flaw incident before EHIVE was Palmswap, 28 days earlier on July 24, 2023 ($900K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the business logic flaw attack surface.
Impact & Recovery for EHIVE
EHIVE Loss Figure
The EHIVE exploit caused $15,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 133rd largest of 214 documented in 2023.
Where EHIVE Sits Among Business Logic Flaw Attacks
Ranked by loss size, EHIVE is the 75th largest of 144 business logic flaw incidents documented. That puts the EHIVE loss below the class average of $6.08M.
Timeline Since the EHIVE Incident
The EHIVE exploit occurred 2.6 years ago (967 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for EHIVE
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the EHIVE incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did EHIVE lose?
The EHIVE exploit in August 2023 resulted in $15,000 in losses — the 133rd largest of 214 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the EHIVE hack happen?
The EHIVE exploit was recorded on August 21, 2023 — 967 days ago.
What type of exploit hit EHIVE?
The EHIVE incident is classified as a Business Logic Flaw. A business-logic bug in the contract — such as an incorrect formula or missing state update — lets the attacker withdraw more than their share.
How common is the Business Logic Flaw pattern seen at EHIVE?
Our archive contains 144 documented business logic flaw incidents. The EHIVE incident is one of them.
How does EHIVE compare to the largest Business Logic Flaw attack?
The largest business logic flaw incident in our archive is – EulerFinance (2023) at $200M. The EHIVE loss is $15K.
What is the main goal of cross-chain transaction technologies?
To promote the scalability of cryptocurrencies and facilitate the development of Metaverse applications.
How do multi-adaptor signatures improve blockchain transactions?
Multi-adaptor signatures require the participation of all secret key holders in the signing protocol, ensuring collective agreement on transactions.