On December 2022, – BGLD (Deflationary token) was exploited in a price manipulation, resulting in approximately $18K in losses. That makes the – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit the 340th largest DeFi incident out of 690 documented in our archive.
Attack Mechanics: How the – BGLD (Deflationary token) Price Manipulation Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to – BGLD (Deflationary token)
The – BGLD (Deflationary token) incident on December 12, 2022 is classified as a Price Manipulation. The attacker drives the on-chain price of a token up or down within a single transaction to extract value from the protocol. In the full archive, – BGLD (Deflationary token) is 1 of 85 documented price manipulation incidents.
– BGLD (Deflationary token) in Context
At $18K, the – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit is a minor (<$1M) event compared to the largest same-class incident in our archive — CreamFinance (2021) at $130M.
Prior Price Manipulation Before – BGLD (Deflationary token)
The nearest price manipulation incident before – BGLD (Deflationary token) was – Lodestar, 1 day earlier on December 11, 2022 ($4M lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the price manipulation attack surface.
– BGLD (Deflationary token) Vulnerability Signature
The primary source categorises the – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit specifically as “FlashLoan price manipulation”. This narrower label is entity-specific: it reflects how the – BGLD (Deflationary token) contract failed, rather than the broad price manipulation pattern alone.
Impact & Recovery for – BGLD (Deflationary token)
– BGLD (Deflationary token) Loss Figure
The – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit caused $18,000 in losses — a minor (<$1M) incident and the 43rd largest of 129 documented in 2022.
Where – BGLD (Deflationary token) Sits Among Price Manipulation Attacks
Ranked by loss size, – BGLD (Deflationary token) is the 51st largest of 85 price manipulation incidents documented. That puts the – BGLD (Deflationary token) loss below the class average of $3.9M.
Timeline Since the – BGLD (Deflationary token) Incident
The – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit occurred 3.3 years ago (1,219 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for – BGLD (Deflationary token)
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the – BGLD (Deflationary token) incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did – BGLD (Deflationary token) lose?
The – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit in December 2022 resulted in $18,000 in losses — the 43rd largest of 129 DeFi incidents that year.
When did the – BGLD (Deflationary token) hack happen?
The – BGLD (Deflationary token) exploit was recorded on December 12, 2022 — 1,219 days ago.
What type of exploit hit – BGLD (Deflationary token)?
The – BGLD (Deflationary token) incident is classified as a Price Manipulation. The attacker drives the on-chain price of a token up or down within a single transaction to extract value from the protocol.
How common is the Price Manipulation pattern seen at – BGLD (Deflationary token)?
Our archive contains 85 documented price manipulation incidents. The – BGLD (Deflationary token) incident is one of them.
How does – BGLD (Deflationary token) compare to the largest Price Manipulation attack?
The largest price manipulation incident in our archive is CreamFinance (2021) at $130M. The – BGLD (Deflationary token) loss is $18K.
What impact do forks have on investor behavior and market dynamics?
Forks can lead to new investor participation and potentially shift market dynamics by creating new cryptocurrencies with distinct characteristics or goals.
What is the significance of hybrid deep learning models in the study?
Hybrid deep learning models are highlighted for their superior performance over other learning algorithms.