On October 2023, LaEeb suffered a slippage abuse — the first of 13 documented slippage abuse incidents in our archive where the loss figure was not publicly disclosed but the exploit pattern is documented below.
Attack Mechanics: How the LaEeb Slippage Abuse Played Out
Exploit Class Applied to LaEeb
The LaEeb incident on October 30, 2023 is classified as a Slippage Abuse. Unprotected swap routes let the attacker extract value through sandwich trades or price drift. In the full archive, LaEeb is 1 of 13 documented slippage abuse incidents.
LaEeb in Context
The LaEeb incident joins a class whose largest loss to date is DCFToken (2025) at $442K.
Prior Slippage Abuse Before LaEeb
The nearest slippage abuse incident before LaEeb was FireBirdPair, 30 days earlier on September 30, 2023 ($3.2K lost). The same exploit class surfaced again within the slippage abuse attack surface.
LaEeb Vulnerability Signature
The primary source categorises the LaEeb exploit specifically as “Lack Slippage Protection”. This narrower label is entity-specific: it reflects how the LaEeb contract failed, rather than the broad slippage abuse pattern alone.
Impact & Recovery for LaEeb
LaEeb Loss Figure
The loss figure for LaEeb is not publicly disclosed. The primary source reports the exploit in non-USD terms, so no USD estimate is published here. For reference, the average loss across 13 slippage abuse incidents in our archive is $119.9K.
Timeline Since the LaEeb Incident
The LaEeb exploit occurred 2.5 years ago (897 days). The contract, its fork-block, and the attack transaction remain on-chain and forensically reproducible.
Primary Reference for LaEeb
Public post-mortem / on-chain analysis for the LaEeb incident: view source.
FAQ
How much did LaEeb lose?
The LaEeb loss figure is not publicly disclosed. The primary source reports the exploit in non-USD token terms, so no USD estimate is published here.
When did the LaEeb hack happen?
The LaEeb exploit was recorded on October 30, 2023 — 897 days ago.
What type of exploit hit LaEeb?
The LaEeb incident is classified as a Slippage Abuse. Unprotected swap routes let the attacker extract value through sandwich trades or price drift.
How common is the Slippage Abuse pattern seen at LaEeb?
Our archive contains 13 documented slippage abuse incidents. The LaEeb incident is one of them.
How does LaEeb compare to the largest Slippage Abuse attack?
The largest slippage abuse incident in our archive is DCFToken (2025) at $442K. The LaEeb loss was not publicly disclosed.
What is the significance of achieving unlinkability in cross-chain transactions?
Unlinkability ensures that transactions between different blockchains cannot be traced back to the parties involved, enhancing privacy.
How does the study contribute to the existing literature on ESG and firm value?
It expands empirical evidence by analyzing the value creation from CSR activities in an emerging market context, specifically Brazil.